June 9, 2020
FACTORS INFLUENCING DEMAND FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POST-PEAK
After two months of lockdown, the Commonwealth is preparing to reopen under Governor Baker’s four-phased reopening plan. The plan, presented on May 18, 2020, calls for a very gradual return of non-essential workers to the workplace, capping office capacities and encouraging continued teleworking, if applicable. The early phases of this plan prioritize public transit for essential workers, as well as non-essential workers that cannot telecommute—the MBTA is not slated to resume full service until Phase 3. As travel restrictions are lifted and full service resumes, non-essential workers will begin to assess the safety and feasibility of their once rote commutes.
In Greater Boston, public transportation is one of the most important components of a successful reopening of the economy. It is the sole link—the connector—for many residents to their jobs and livelihoods. Pre-COVID-19, more than 500,000 people took 1.18 million trips on an average weekday in Massachusetts, including low-income (28.8% across all modes, 41.5% on buses and trackless trolleys) and minority riders (34.3% across all modes, 48% on buses and trackless trolleys, 41.7% on the silver line).2 3 Total ridership has plummeted by 85% during the pandemic with stay at home orders and service prioritization for essential workers.4 Across the country, and no doubt on the MBTA, the make-up of public transit riders has also shifted, with an increase in women (56%) and a decrease in white transit users (50% reduction). As one result of this shift the current majority of users are Black and/or Latino.5
A recent Transit survey suggests that 9% of transit users have a car, an additional 6% have access to a car, and the remaining 85% of users depend on public transit (with access to cars lowest amongst low-income users). As the economy continues to reopen, therefore, there will inevitably be an uptick in transit demand.6 What exactly ridership will look like post-surge remains an unknown, but it is critical that MBTA put in place measures that ensure the safety of all riders as well as the system’s workforce. The current COVID-19 response measures cater to lower ridership and frontline workers, and more stringent measures will be necessary to gradually accommodate a safe return to the workplace for people who are currently teleworking or using a non-public transit mode to commute.
An initial survey by Suffolk University indicated that only 18% of people would be comfortable riding public transportation as they return to the workplace.7 However, recent polling results from MassINC show that many previous public transit users in the Commonwealth will not return to their normal commuter modes, i.e. the commuter rail (-28%), subway (-29%), and bus (-30%), at least in the short term, when they go back to their workplaces.8 There are many factors that will influence post-peak public transit use. The MassINC poll suggests that a person’s ability to telework is a primary factor (41% polled would prefer to work from home), followed by mitigation of public health risks on the transit system, including in stations, on platforms, and in vehicles.9
FIGURE 1: WHAT RIDERS WANT FROM THE MBTA BEFORE GETTING BACK ON PUBLIC TRANSIT
Source: The MassINC Polling Group – Taking precautions would make residents more comfortable on transit - % who say they would feel comfortable riding transit if specific precautions were taken
While a good portion of the workforce in Massachusetts may not return to the workplace in Phase I or II of the Commonwealth’s reopening, it is critical, and never too early, to start providing riders with the facts on (1) public health risks associated with public transit, and (2) actions taken by transit agencies to reduce these risks. This piece focuses on the public health risks associated with public transportation and the shared responsibility between transit agencies and riders to minimize them. It also seeks to underscore the need to ensure safe public transportation for all riders.
Across the globe, public transit systems are instituting public outreach and education campaigns as a call for collective action to create the safest commuting environment possible. Public transit riders in the Commonwealth would benefit from a similar information and outreach campaign (multilingual and multimedia), as well as targeted health and safety guidelines for riders throughout the four reopening phases, to support a joint approach between transit agencies and riders to commuting post-COVID-19 peak.
Note: In Paris, “Pour Notre Santé a Tous” or “For All of Our Health” frames the return to public transit system as a shared responsibility.
Before getting back on public transit, commuters should have the facts about the health risks they may face when riding. The basic assumption has been that there is a correlation between public transit use and spread of infectious diseases, but research on this topic is limited. This analysis builds off available scientific literature on the transmission of influenza-like viruses on public transit and recent articles and papers on the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 and public transportation.
Scientific research shows that closed, poorly ventilated, and crowded environments can act as hotspots for spreading disease; therefore, riding on public transit that meets this description comes with potential health risks.10 The main factors thought to influence direct and indirect transmission of the disease on public transit include the health and age of the passenger, the number of passengers on board (density, crowding), the amount of time riders are on the system (trip duration), and the extent of contact with infected surfaces.11 Recent research suggests that the type of station (underground or aboveground) also plays a role, stipulating that riders are more vulnerable to transmission when using underground stations than when their commute relies primarily on aboveground stations (average influenza-like illness (ILI) 7.61 per 100,000 contacts, compared to 10.24 ILI per 100,000 contacts on underground lines).12 13
FIGURE 2: KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING SARS-COV-2 TRANSMISSION RISK ON PUBLIC TRANSIT
A recent example from China involving two buses (one with an asymptomatic passenger and another with no infected passengers) shows the risk of transmission in confined spaces, including mass transit, and the resulting importance of wearing facial coverings, practicing physical distancing, and ensuring proper cleaning, disinfection, and ventilation to prevent the spread of disease. On one of the buses (bus 2, capacity 75, carried 67 passengers), there was an asymptomatic passenger who later tested positive for the coronavirus. The other bus (bus 1, capacity 75, carried 59 passengers) carried no infected passengers. Both buses had air conditioning with indoor recirculation mode on and brought people to the same venue, where they interacted. Twenty-four out of 67 people on bus 2 that carried the asymptomatic passenger got sick. No one who traveled on the other bus got sick.14
WHY PHYSICAL DISTANCING, FACE COVERINGS, AND PERSONAL HYGIENE ARE
|
|
TRANSMISSION METHOD | DISTANCE CARRIED (DROPLETS) |
Breathing or talking | Up to 1 meter (~3 feet) |
Coughing | Up to 2 meters (~6.5 feet) |
Sneezing | Up to 6 meters (~19.6 feet) |
Source: Adapted from Goscé and Johansson Environmental Health (2018) 17:84 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0427-5
According to the CDC, transmission of the coronavirus occurs much more commonly through respiratory droplets than through objects and surfaces, but it is unknown how long the air inside a space occupied by someone with confirmed COVID-19 remains potentially infectious. Additionally, current evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may remain viable for hours to days on surfaces made from a variety of materials. As a result, public transit riders are susceptible to both direct and indirect transmission while they are commuting. 16 17 18
Source: Julia L. Marcus, PhD, MPH, Assistant Professor in the Department of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and Adjunct Faculty at The Fenway Institute, Professor Ellie Murray, Boston University School of Public Health (https://twitter.com/JuliaLMarcus/status/1262448399888142337?s=20) / https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/5/22/21265180/cdc-coronavirus-surfaces-social-distancing-guidelines-covid-19-risks
TABLE 1: QUALITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION SETTINGS
CATEGORY |
CONTACT INTENSITY |
NUMBER OF CONTACTS |
MODIFICATION POTENTIAL |
Buses | High | High | Medium |
Metros/Rail | High | High | Medium |
Rideshare/Taxis | High | Low | Low |
Note: While public transportation does rank high for contact intensity and number of contacts, agencies do have a fair potential to mitigate these risks by putting in place physical distancing protocols, engineering responses, and PPE protocols
Because there are risks to transit riders and operators, public transit agencies have a responsibility to take adequate steps to ensure public health on the system, including robust cleaning and disinfecting protocols; face coverings for workers and riders; creating and ensuring adequate physical distancing in stations and on vehicles; and improving ventilation.24 However, this responsibility is a shared responsibility with the riders it serves. Transit agency measures alone will not ensure a safe commute.
Commuting in the post COVID-19 world comes with a new set of rules and a call for collective action to jointly create conditions that prevent the spread of the disease on public transit. This means moving from an “I Commute” attitude, to a “We Commute” mentality. More than ever, public transit riders are an integral part of the solution to ensuring a safe commuting environment.
There are proven ways for public transit users to protect themselves and their fellow commuters, which dovetail with the main approaches that transit systems will likely adopt, specifically on 1) cleaning and disinfecting, 2) face coverings, and 3) physical distancing, as well as some other hygiene tips that further empower riders to safeguard the shared commute.
If you are SYMPTOMATIC OR HAVE TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID-19, coughing and/or sneezing, you are putting fellow riders at risk. Why? The droplets in a single cough or sneeze may contain as many as 200,000,000 (two hundred million) virus particles, and if you cough or sneeze, those 200,000,000 viral particles go everywhere. Even if you are not face-to-face with another commuter, your infected droplets can hang in the air for a few minutes and fill a modest sized room (or bus, commuter rail coach, trolley car), which puts other commuters at risk just by breathing.35 If you are PRE-OR ASYMPTOMATIC, you are also putting fellow riders at risk for similar reasons but also because the virus can replicate in eyes and nasal passages via hands, i.e. eye/nose-hand-common touch surface-hand-face.
As of publication, Governor Baker and the MBTA have released only high-level guidance on what will be expected of riders over the four phases of the reopening. The guidance issued to date does asks riders, employers, and the MBTA to work together to ensure the safest possible public transit conditions.
Yes, the return of more non-essential workers public transit and the workplace comes with a shared responsibility by the employers, riders, and the MBTA. Yes, there is a strong public health case to support this approach. However, riders can only do their part if they have clear information on what safety measures the T is putting in place, know the public health risks, and have the knowledge and tools to be part of the shared solution.
Compared to peer agencies in Europe, Asia, and right here in the United States, the guidance issued to date in the reopening plan does not go far enough to provide a safe public transit environment or to educate the rider on what they can do to ensure safe passage for all. As the Commonwealth’s public transit operator, the MBTA must lead the way. The agency should release a comprehensive plan to lay a strong foundation that builds rider confidence and brings commuters back to public transportation that covers all different mitigation strategies for limiting the spread on public transportation.37
To support the implementation of the reopening plan, A Better City recommends that the MBTA's Ride Safer campaign be extensive, far-reaching, and multilingual/multimedia to (1) provide all riders with the information they need to feel and be safe on public transit, and (2) support and coordinate distribution of face coverings and hand hygiene (in stations, on vehicles, on streets) along their commute. These measures will help ensure the MBTA’s current ridership—predominately “essential workers” many of whom are women and people of color,38 —is as prepared and protected as its future ridership. All public transit riders regardless of employment sector status are an equal part of the solution: they are all “commuter heroes” and they all deserve access to the necessary information and protective equipment to continue to use or get back on public transit safely. Together, the MBTA and its riders can pave the way for a social compact to support a strong, resilient, and just public transit system, today, and safeguard this important public good for generations to come.